Martin Jay tackles a question as old as Plato and still pressing today:
what is reason, and what roles does and should it have in human
endeavor? Applying the tools of intellectual history, he examines the
overlapping, but not fully compatible, meanings that have accrued to the
term reason over two millennia, homing in on moments of crisis,
critique, and defense of reason.
After surveying Western ideas of reason from the ancient Greeks through
Kant, Hegel, and Marx, Jay engages at length with the ways leading
theorists of the Frankfurt School--Horkheimer, Marcuse, Adorno, and most
extensively Habermas--sought to salvage a viable concept of reason after
its apparent eclipse. They despaired, in particular, over the decay in
the modern world of reason into mere instrumental rationality. When
reason becomes a technical tool of calculation separated from the values
and norms central to daily life, then choices become grounded not in
careful thought but in emotion and will--a mode of thinking embraced by
fascist movements in the twentieth century.
Is there a more robust idea of reason that can be defended as at once a
philosophical concept, a ground of critique, and a norm for human
emancipation? Jay explores at length the ommunicative rationality
advocated by Habermas and considers the range of arguments, both pro and
con, that have greeted his work.