The conflict in Rwanda and the Great Lakes in 1994-1996 attracted the
horrified attention of the world's media, diplomats and aid workers
struggling to make sense of the bloodshed. This study shows how the
post-genocide regime in Rwanda managed to impose a simple, persuasive
account of Central Africa's crises upon international commentators, and
explains the ideological underpinnings of this official narrative. It is
a sobering analysis of how simple, persuasive, but fatally misleading
analysis of the situation led to policy errors that exacerbated the
original crisis.