While ancient civilizations worshipped strong, active emotions, modern
societies have favored more peaceful attitudes, especially within the
democratic process. We have largely forgotten the struggle to make use
of thymos, the part of the soul that, following Plato, contains
spirit, pride, and indignation. Rather, Christianity and psychoanalysis
have promoted mutual understanding to overcome conflict. Through unique
examples, Peter Sloterdijk, the preeminent posthumanist, argues exactly
the opposite, showing how the history of Western civilization can be
read as a suppression and return of rage.
By way of reinterpreting the Iliad, Alexandre Dumas's Count of Monte
Cristo, and recent Islamic political riots in Paris, Sloterdijk proves
the fallacy that rage is an emotion capable of control. Global terrorism
and economic frustrations have rendered strong emotions visibly
resurgent, and the consequences of violent outbursts will determine
international relations for decades to come. To better respond to rage
and its complexity, Sloterdijk daringly breaks with entrenched dogma and
contructs a new theory for confronting conflict. His approach
acknowledges and respects the proper place of rage and channels it into
productive political struggle.