This book is a strenuous critique of the misinterpretation of
statistical knowledge of populations in mainstream psychology, exploring
the implications of assuming that those statistics constitute scientific
knowledge of individuals. It investigates the essential nature and
historical roots of this interpretive practice, and documents the lack
of change in mainstream thinking despite previous critiques of the
practice. The author contends that prevailing interpretive traditions
result in bad science, in that invalid claims are made to knowledge of
individuals. He also discusses the socio-ethical problems resulting from
this misinterpretation of statistics, where psychological practitioners
unjustifiably endorse interventions in the lives of individuals. Lamiell
urges psychologists to abandon the aggregate statistical methods which
he argues have transformed the field into 'psycho-demography, ' and to
embrace instead alternative research methods that are logically suited
to gaining scientific knowledge about the psychological functioning of
individuals. This book concludes by highlighting some of the currently
available methodological alternatives, as well as discussing some
enduring conceptual impediments to the serious consideration of those
alternatives.