From casualties in textile factories to child slavery on cocoa farms,
firms are repeatedly involved in immoral business practices. Statutory
regulation as well as individual efforts to improve these circumstances
are, however, limited and widely ineffective. Instead, another idea is
becoming increasingly popular: private regulation that enables
collective action. In a nutshell, the idea is for firms to collectively
and voluntarily impose compulsory regulation on themselves in order to
trigger constitutional change. This work discusses the phenomenon and
the conditions under which firms are willing to engage in
multi-stakeholder initiatives. In this vein, it draws on a single
in-depth case study of the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles,
an analysis of which reveals that such private governance institutions
can evolve if actors perceive engagement to be possible, and that the
frontiers of this perception can shift over time if certain conditions
prevail and adjustment mechanisms are applied.