will be "asymptotically integrable", that is to say, if we displace a
vector parallel to itself along a closed curve whose total length is
proportional to r, then, as we remove the curve to infinity, the change
of the vector that results from the circuit about the curve will tend to
zero. In the presence of gravitational radiation the total energy will
not be con- served, because the waves carry some energy with them;
analogous statements apply to the linear momentum, etc. But that is not
all; if there is no coordinate 2 system in which the field strengths
drop off as 1/r, then there is no possibility to generate out of one
vector" at infinity" a whole field of parallel vectors" at infinity".
Thus we are unable in the presence of radiation to define, even at
infinity, a "rigid displacement", the type of coordinate transformation
that is presumably generated by the energy integral. Under these
circumstances it is very difficult to see how one can define the "free
vector" energy -linear momen- tum in a convincing manner. These
ambiguities of course do not imply that general relativity lacks quan-
tities that obey equations of continuity; rather, general relativity
suffers in this respect from an embarras de richesse. There is an
infinity of such quantities, and our difficulty is to single out a
subset and to present these as the "natural" l expressions for energy,
linear momentum, etc.