In investigating the presidential campaigns and early administrations of
Barack Obama, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, Presidential Campaigns
and Presidential Accountability shows how campaign promises are
realized in government once the victor is established in the Oval
Office. To measure correlations between presidential campaigns and
policy-making, Michele P. Claibourn closely examines detailed campaign
advertising information, survey data about citizen's responses to
campaigns, processes that create expectations among constituents, and
media attention and response to candidates. Disputing the notion that
presidents ignore campaign issues upon being elected, Presidential
Campaigns and Presidential Accountability contends that candidates
raise issues that matter and develop ideas to address these issues based
on voter reactions. Conventional disappointment in presidential
campaigns stems from a misunderstanding of the role that presidents play
in a system of separate institutions sharing power, and Claibourn forces
us to think about presidential campaigns in the context of the
presidency--what the president realistically can and cannot do. Based on
comparisons of the Clinton, Bush, and Obama campaigns and the first
years of the subsequent presidential administrations, Claibourn builds a
generalized theory of agenda accountability, showing how presidential
action is constrained by campaign agendas.