Poststructuralism, and its implications for something called
'postmodernism, ' is a major topic of discussion in social theory and
research generally, including educational research. The works of the
major authors in this tradition (Foucault, Lyotard, Cixous, Derrida,
Haraway, to name a few) are challenging and difficult. Yet more and more
theorists and researchers in educational scholarship use this term to
describe their work. What does poststructuralism mean for these authors,
and what significance does it have for educational inquiry? This book
takes on these central questions and explores the impact of
poststructuralism in language that makes the basic issues at stake
accessible for a broad readership. Michael Peters and Nicholas C.
Burbules highlight the implications of a poststructuralist stance for
the conception of the research subject and examine its standards of
validity and methods of investigation. They also lay out the
distinguishing characteristics of this approach to educational inquiry,
using as examples the particular ways in which writers (including
Giroux, McLaren, Lather, and Ball) have tried to incorporate the
poststructuralist perspective into their investigations of educational
issues. The emphasis throughout this book will be on making these
complex theoretical issues tangible and salient for the educational
researcher