In 1968, the German Supreme Court decided in the case of Mephisto that
survivors may prohibit presumptive detriments to the personality of a
deceased relative. To this day, this judgment is still in force and
adhered to by courts, although at the same time the question of its
legal basis remains unanswered. The judges' reasoning is missing
stringency and clarity, and opinions voiced in the secondary literature
of this case differ greatly. This volume looks at the existing models of
justification and tests them for their compatibility with the dogmatics
and foundations of civil law. It comes to the conclusion that existing
law has no provisions for postmortal protection of nonasset personality
rights. Taking the implications of constitutional law into
consideration, it also studies how such a postmortal protection of
nonasset personality rights might be codified in law. This makes clear
that postmortal protection of nonasset personality rights is a public
matter, the settlement of which should be a part of public law. German
text.