Peer review is the process by which submissions to journals and presses
are evaluated with regard to suitability for publication. Armed with the
results of numerous empirical studies, critics have leveled a variety of
harsh charges against peer review such as: reviewers and editors are
biased toward authors from prestigious institutions, peer review is
biased toward established ideas, and it does a poor job of detecting
errors and fraud. While an immense literature has sprouted on peer
review in the sciences and social sciences, Peer Review is the first
book-length, wide-ranging study of peer review that utilizes methods and
resources of contemporary philosophy. Its six chapters cover the
following topics: the tension between peer review and the liberal notion
that truth emerges when ideas proliferate in the marketplace of ideas;
arguments for and against blind review of submissions; the alleged
conservatism of peer review; the anomalous nature of book reviewing; the
status of non-peer-reviewed publications, such as invited articles or
Internet publications, in tenure and promotion cases; and the future of
peer review in the age of the Internet. The author has also included
several key readings about peer review.