The questions of what psychoanalysis is, and does, and who can and
should practice it, remains key within the modern profession. Has the
invaluable material packed into Freud's The Question of Lay Analysis
(1926) been underestimated by contemporary psychoanalysis? This book
explores how the issues raised in this paper can continue to impact
contemporary Freudian theory and practice. The chapters examine why the
arguably litigious nature of the paper might be contributing to its
neglect and underestimation.
The editors of this book put forth a hypothesis: is there an underlying,
still unrecognized, but heartrending factor underlying the century-old
quarrel between "lay analysts" and what might be described as medically
or psychiatrically trained analysts? They then brought together a
selection of major contemporary psychoanalytic thinkers from around the
world to attempt to bridge the seemingly unbridgeable gap between
medical and non-medical analysis, using The Question of Lay Analysis
as a central pivot. The work of the key figure, in social and historic
terms, on this issue, Theodor Reik, is also duly honoured.
On Freud's "The Question of Lay Analysis" will be of great interest to
all psychoanalysts and psychoanalytic psychotherapists.