In a recent poll of practicing art critics, 75 percent reported that
rendering judgments on artworks was the least significant aspect of
their job. This is a troubling statistic for philosopher and critic Noel
Carroll, who argues that that the proper task of the critic is not
simply to describe, or to uncover hidden meanings or agendas, but
instead to determine what is of value in art.
Carroll argues for a humanistic conception of criticism which focuses on
what the artist has achieved by creating or performing the work. Whilst
a good critic should not neglect to contextualize and offer
interpretations of a work of art, he argues that too much recent
criticism has ignored the fundamental role of the artist's intentions.
Including examples from visual, performance and literary arts, and the
work of contemporary critics, Carroll provides a charming, erudite and
persuasive argument that evaluation of art is an indispensable part of
the conversation of life.