For readers who intend to read this volume without reading the ftrst,
some introductory remarks are in order about the scope of the work and
the strategy used in all ftve volumes to measure the quality of life. In
the ftrst chapter of Volume I, I reviewed the relevant recent literature
on social indicators and social reporting, and explained all the general
difficulties involved in such work. It would be redundant to repeat that
discussion here, but there are some fundamental points that are worth
mentioning. Readers who fmd this account too brief should consult the
longer discussion. The basic question that will be answered in this work
in this: Is there a difference in the quality of life in Canada and the
United States of America, and if so, in which country is it better?
Alternatively, one could put the question thus: If one individual were
randomly selected out of Canada and another out of the United States,
would there be important qualitative differences, and if so, which one
would probably be better off? To simplify matters, I often use the terms
'Canadian' and 'American' as abbreviations for 'a randomly selected
resident' of Canada or the United States, respectively.