Steven Shapin argues that science, for all its immense authority and
power, is and always has been a human endeavor, subject to human
capacities and limits. Put simply, science has never been pure. To be
human is to err, and we understand science better when we recognize it
as the laborious achievement of fallible, imperfect, and historically
situated human beings.
Shapin's essays collected here include reflections on the historical
relationships between science and common sense, between science and
modernity, and between science and the moral order. They explore the
relevance of physical and social settings in the making of scientific
knowledge, the methods appropriate to understanding science
historically, dietetics as a compelling site for historical inquiry, the
identity of those who have made scientific knowledge, and the means by
which science has acquired credibility and authority.
This wide-ranging and intensely interdisciplinary collection by one of
the most distinguished historians and sociologists of science represents
some of the leading edges of change in the scholarly understanding of
science over the past several decades.