We are rarely asked to. make decisions based on only one criterion; most
often, decisions are based on several usually confticting, criteria. In
nature, if the design of a system evolves to some final, optimal state,
then it must include a balance for the interaction of the system with
its surroundings- certainly a design based on a variety of criteria.
Furthermore, the diversity of nature's designs suggests an infinity of
such optimal states. In another sense, decisions simultaneously optimize
a finite number of criteria, while there is usually an infinity of
optimal solutions. Multicriteria optimization provides the mathematical
framework to accommodate these demands. Multicriteria optimization has
its roots in mathematical economics, in particular, in consumer
economics as considered by Edgeworth and Pareto. The critical question
in an exchange economy concerns the "equilibrium point" at which each of
N consumers has achieved the best possible deal for hirnself or herself.
Ultimately, this is a collective decision in which any further gain by
one consumer can occur only at the expense of at least one other
consumer. Such an equilibrium concept was first introduced by Edgeworth
in 1881 in his book on mathematical psychics. Today, such an optimum is
variously called "Pareto optimum" (after the Italian-French welfare
economist who continued and expanded Edgeworth's work), "effi. cient,"
"nondominated," and so on.