Is it possible to make sense of moral praise and blame when a person's
life is a tangled web of factors outside of his control? Cases of moral
luck bring to the forefront the perplexing idea that we can be held
responsible for what is, essentially, a matter of chance. This book
offers a systematic and in-depth account of two major normative theories
and their responses to the possibility of moral luck. Aristotle attempts
to recognize the vulnerability of the good life and reconcile morality
with luck, whereas the Kantian ambition is to make morality immune to
luck while maintaining a plausible understanding of human nature. Using
the questions raised by the problem of moral luck, this book critically
assesses the most recent developments by virtue ethicists and
neo-Kantians, and examines how these different theories understand
concepts such as 'character' and 'virtue'.