It is delightful but humbling to find my face at the start of these
Proceedings--there are innumerable other faces which could equally weIl
stand there, from among the band who have fore- gathered at every
gerontology conference since the subject was launched in its present
form; but I deeply appreciate being there. Gerontology d. id not grow by
accident. Its present standing is the fruit of careful planning,
undertaken by European and American scientists back in the 1950's. In
those days it was still a "fringe" science, and the conspirators had
much the standing of the 1920's Interplanetary Society. The United
States itself is the offspring of conspiracy, for when the results of
conspiracy are beneficent, the conspirators become Founding Fathers.
This has been the case with gerontology. The present meeting is
especially gratifying because the papers have been recitals of normal,
hard-science investigation. We had to get through the rigors of a long
period of semantic argument and a long period of one-shot general
theories before this kind of meeting, normal in all other research
fields, could take place. It was also necesssary to breed in the
menagerie a generation of excellent investigators aware of the
theoretical background but unintimidated by it, who share our conviction
that human aging is comprehensible and probably controllable, and who go
into the laboratory to attack specifics.