up with automated systems for assessment of road condition. For example,
Haas et al (1997) developed an automated algorithm for detecting cracks
and joints con- tion. Smith and Lin (1997) developed a fuzzy logic
classification scheme for pavement distress condition. Oh et al (1997)
developed iterative algorithm for overcoming noisy images of roads due
to shadows and low light conditions. Koustsopoulos and Mishalani (1997)
presented a model for distress assessment in a local (microscopic) and
global (macroscopic) level using captured images of pavement. Lee (1993)
presented a comparison between 15 different imaging al- rithms used in
crack detection. Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) has also been used for
pavement assessment. Special computer algorithms were developed for
quick analysis of GPR data (Adeli & Hung 1993 and Maser 1996). Heiler
and McNeil (1997) proposed a modified system for analyzing the GPR data
using an artificial neural network (ANN). 2.3.2 Traffic Analysis and
Control Currently imaging systems provide essential data for
transportation and traffic engineering planning (Anon 1999). Machine
vision techniques were introduced to intersection traffic signal control
in the late 1970's (Chou and Sethi 1993). No- days, many systems have
been developed all over the world for traffic analysis and control
applications, in addition to image based systems for traffic violations.
Nallamathu and Wang (1997) developed one of the first automated systems
for license plate recognition using character recognition algorithm for
the use in monitoring violators at toll stations and many other traffic
applications.