Is linguistic meaning to be accounted for independently of the states of
mind of language users, or can it only be explained in terms of them? If
the latter, what account of the mental states in question avoids
circularity? In this book Brian Loar offers a subtle and comprehensive
theory that both preserves the natural priority of the mind in
explanations of meaning, and gives an independent characterisation of
its features. the nature of meaning and its relation to the mind is
probably the area of paramount concern among philosophers. The theory
presented here, by its reach and substance and the thoroughness and
sophistication of its development, makes a major contribution to the
debate.