The English philosopher Michael Oakeshott (1901-1990) is known as a
conservative who rejected philosophically ambitious rationalism and the
grand political ideologies of the twentieth century on the grounds that
no human ideas have ultimately reliable foundations. Instead, he
embraced tradition and habit as the guides to moral and political life.
In this book, Aryeh Botwinick presents an original account of
Oakeshott's skepticism about foundations, an account that newly reveals
the unity of his thought.
Botwinick argues that, despite Oakeshott's pragmatic conservatism, his
rejection of all-embracing intellectual projects made him a friend to
liberal individualism and an ally of what would become postmodern
antifoundationalism. Oakeshott's skepticism even extended paradoxically
to skepticism about skepticism itself and is better described as a
"generalized agnosticism." Properly conceived and translated, this
agnosticism ultimately evolves into mysticism, which becomes a bridge
linking philosophy and religion. Botwinick explains and develops this
strategy of interpretation and then shows how it illuminates and unifies
the diverse strands of Oakeshott's thought in the philosophy of
religion, metaphysics, epistemology, political theory, philosophy of
personal identity, philosophy of law, and philosophy of history.