The idea that the period of social turbulence in the nineteenth century
was a consequence of the emergence of the powerful Zulu kingdom under
Shaka has been written about extensively as a central episode of
southern African history.
Considerable dynamic debate has focused on the idea that this period -
the 'mfecane'- left much of the interior depopulated, thereby justifying
white occupation. One view is that 'the time of troubles' owed more to
the Delagoa Bay Slave trade and the demands of the labour-hungry Cape
colonists than to Shaka's empire building. But is there sufficient
evidence to support the argument?
The Mfecane Aftermath investigates the very nature of historical debate
and examines the uncertain foundations of much of the previous
historiography.