In today's highly competitive business environment, companies have
recognised the increasing importance of brands as one of their most
important assets. However, now the discussion is how to measure the
value of such an important asset and what makes this valuation
important. The purpose of this thesis is the critical comparison between
two well-known brand valuation methods in order to choose the one that
reflects the monetary value of a brand best possible. For this purpose,
the methods are first analysed in relation to their compliance with the
requirements for brand valuation methods. Secondly, the extent to which
the methods can be applied for the different valuation purposes is also
analysed. The two selected methods are the Interbrand model (from
Interbrand Zintzmeyer & Lux) and the Brand Equity Evaluator model (from
BBDO Consulting).