A situation in economics that is little short of scandalous is the
almost total neglect by mainstream economics of the importance of power
in economic affairs. Power in this context means the ability to bend
market forces in one's favor, influencing and shaping key economic
variables such as prices, wages, and other income determinants. As John
Kenneth Galbraith as- tutely observes: a dominant fact in economic life
is the desire of people everywhere and in all circumstances to get
control over their personal lives and their incomes-to escape from the
"tyranny of the market. " Power is the means to this end. Ever since
Adam Smith, economists have been fascinated by and lavish in their
praise for the workings of the market. All modern textbooks are built
around Smithian ideas about markets and the way the "invisible hand"
works through competition for society's better- ment. Yet one can search
nearly in vain through leading texts, under- graduate and graduate
alike, for any reference to market or economic power. This is the
situation in spite of the fact that the drive for power, the urge to get
control over one's income, permeates the economy as much as does
competition. This is a scandal! For a discipline that claims for itself
the mantle of a science-one which wants to be accorded the same respect
given the natural sciences-it is almost incomprehensible that it should
ignore a major force at work in the real economic world.