If free market advocates had total control over education policy, would
the shared public system of education collapse? Would school choice
revitalize schooling with its innovative force? With proliferating
charters and voucher schemes, would the United States finally make a
dramatic break with its past and expand parental choice?
Those are not only the wrong questions--they're the wrong premises,
argue philosopher Sigal R. Ben-Porath and historian Michael C. Johanek
in Making Up Our Mind. Market-driven school choices aren't new. They
predate the republic, and for generations parents have chosen to educate
their children through an evolving mix of publicly supported, private,
charitable, and entrepreneurial enterprises. The question is not
whether to have school choice. It is how we will regulate who has
which choices in our mixed market for schooling--and what we, as a
nation, hope to accomplish with that mix of choices. Looking beyond the
simplistic divide between those who oppose government intervention and
those who support public education, the authors make the case for a
structured landscape of choice in schooling, one that protects the
interests of children and of society, while also identifying key shared
values on which a broadly acceptable policy could rest.