Poetry makes nothing happen," wrote W. H. Auden in 1939, expressing a
belief that came to dominate American literary institutions in the late
1940s--the idea that good poetry cannot, and should not, be politically
engaged. By contrast, Michael Thurston here looks back to the 1920s and
1930s to a generation of poets who wrote with the precise hope and the
deep conviction that they would move their audiences to action. He
offers an engaging new look at the political poetry of Edwin Rolfe,
Langston Hughes, Ezra Pound, and Muriel Rukeyser.
Thurston combines close textual reading of the poems with research into
their historical context to reveal how these four poets deployed the
resources of tradition and experimentation to contest and redefine
political common sense. In the process, he demonstrates that the
aesthetic censure under which much partisan writing has labored needs
dramatic revision. Although each of these poets worked with different
forms and toward different ends, Thurston shows that their strategies
succeed as poetry. He argues that partisan poetry demands reflection not
only on how we evaluate poems but also on what we value in poems and,
therefore, which poems we elevate.