While conflict in cyberspace is not a new phenomenon, the legality of
hostile cyber activity at a state level remains imperfectly defined.
While there is broad agreement among the United States and its allies
that cyber warfare would be governed by existing law of armed conflict,
with no need for additional treaties or conventions to regulate
hostilities online, this view is not shared by many nations that the
United States could potentially face as adversaries. A range of foreign
states use definitions for cyber conflict that are entirely different
from our own, extending to different concepts of what constitutes online
hostilities and even a state of war. This leads to a potentially
dangerous situation where an adversary could be operating according to
an entirely different understanding of international law to that
followed by the United States. In this Letort Paper, Mr. Keir Giles uses
Russian-language sources and interviews to illustrate the very distinct
set of views on the nature of conflict...