The development of materials for any replacement or regeneration
application should be based on the thorough understanding of the
structure to be substituted. This is true in many fields, but
particularly exigent in substitution and regeneration medicine. The
demands upon the material properties largely depend on the site of
application and the function it has to restore. Ideally, a replacement
material should mimic the living tissue from a mechanical, chemical,
biological and functional point of view. Of course this is much easier
to write down than to implement in clinical practice. Mineralized
tissues such as bones, tooth and shells have attracted, in the last few
years, considerable interest as natural anisotropic composite structures
with adequate mechanical properties. In fact, Nature is and will
continue to be the best materials scientist ever. Who better than nature
can design complex structures and control the intricate phenomena
(processing routes) that lead to the final shape and structure (from the
macro to the nano level) of living creatures? Who can combine biological
and physico-chemical mechanisms in such a way that can build ideal
structure-properties relationships? Who, else than Nature, can really
design smart structural components that respond in-situ to exterior
stimulus, being able of adapting constantly their microstructure and
correspondent properties? In the described philosophy line, mineralized
tissues and biomineralization processes are ideal examples to learn-from
for the materials scientist of the future.