In Boccaccio's time, the Italian city-state began to take on a much more
proactive role in prosecuting crime - one which superseded a largely
communitarian, private approach. The emergence of the state-sponsored
inquisitorial trial indeed haunts the legal proceedings staged in the
Decameron. How, Justin Steinberg asks, does this significant juridical
shift alter our perspective on Boccaccio's much-touted realism and
literary self-consciousness? What can it tell us about how he views his
predecessor, Dante: perhaps the world's most powerful inquisitorial
judge? And to what extent does the Decameron shed light on the enduring
role of verisimilitude and truth-seeming in our current legal system?
The author explores these and other literary, philosophical, and ethical
questions that Boccaccio raises in the Decameron's numerous trials. The
book will appeal to scholars and students of medieval and early modern
studies, literary theory and legal history.