The preamble to the post-apartheid South African constitution states
that 'South Africa belongs to all who live in it, united in our
diversity' and promises to 'lay the foundations for a democratic and
open society in which government is based on the will of the people and
every citizen is equally protected by law' and to 'improve the quality
of life of all citizens'. This would seem to commit the South African
government to, amongst other things, the implementation of policies
aimed at fostering a common sense of South African national identity, at
societal dev- opment and at reducing of levels of social inequality.
However, in the period of more than a decade that has now elapsed since
the end of apartheid, there has been widespread discontent with regard
to the degree of progress made in connection with the realisation of
these constitutional aspirations. The 'limits to liberation' in the
post-apartheid era has been a theme of much recent research in the ?elds
of sociology and political theory (e. g. Luckham, 1998; Robins, 2005a).
Linguists have also paid considerable attention to the South African
situation with the realisation that many of the factors that have
prevented, and are continuing to prevent, effective progress towards the
achievement of these constitutional goals are linguistic in their
origin.