Tina Thurston's Landscapes of Power; Landscapes of Conflict is a thi-
generation processual analysis of sociopolitical evolution during the
Iron Age in southern Scandinavia. Several red flags seem to be raised at
once. Are not archaeologists now postprocessual, using new interpretive
approaches to - derstand human history? Is not evolution a discredited
concept in which - cieties are arbitrarily arranged along a unilinear
scheme? Should not modern approaches be profoundly historical and
agent-centered? In any event, were not Scandinavians the ultimate
barbarian Vikings parasitizing the complex civilized world of southern
and central Europe? Tina Thurston's book focuses our attention on the
significant innovations of anthropological archaeology at the end of the
twentieth century. A brief overview of processual archaeology can set
the context for - preciating Landscapes ofPower; Landscapes of Conflict.
During the 1960s the emergent processual archaeology (a. k. a. the New
Archaeology) cryst- lized an evolutionary paradigm that framed research
with the comparative ethnography of Service and Fried. It was thought
that human societies p- gressed through stages of social development and
that the goal was to d- cover the evolutionary prime movers (such as
irrigation, warfare, trade, and population) that drove social and
cultural change. By the 1970s prime movers had fallen from favor and
social evolution was conceived as complicated flows of causation
involving many variables.