In 1965 I was asked by Dr. Konrad Springer whether I would consider
writing a monograph on "Lampbrush chromosomes and their physiological
meaning", and although I accepted in principle I refused to write there
and then, or to meet a deadline. I wanted to continue with my own
research, and I had other responsibilities that left me with little free
time, but a much more important consideration was that in the 1960s the
subject was beset by a host of unresolved questions. I felt that to
write a review then would be premature, full of speculations many of
which would be refuted, and indeed were refuted, within the next decade
or two. Had I written at that time the only real advantage over the
present would have been that few biologists were studying lampbrush
chromo- somes, and the published literature was therefore scanty. I am
glad that I insisted on delay, and am grateful for Springer Verlag's
patient acceptance of my decision. The first chapter of this monograph
describes the history of research on lampbrush chromosomes from their
discovery towards the end of the 19th century until the early 1960s. By
then several facts concerning their structure and chemistry had been
firmly established, including the evidence that a lampbrush chromatid is
unineme; it contains a single uninterrupted DNA duplex. This exposed a
major problem, the C-value paradox; grades of complexity of organization
in eukaryotes are unrelated to their genome sizes.