States are more likely to engage in risky and destabilizing actions such
as military buildups and preemptive strikes if they believe their
adversaries pose a tangible threat. Yet despite the crucial importance
of this issue, we don't know enough about how states and their leaders
draw inferences about their adversaries' long-term intentions. Knowing
the Adversary draws on a wealth of historical archival evidence to shed
new light on how world leaders and intelligence organizations actually
make these assessments.
Keren Yarhi-Milo examines three cases: Britain's assessments of Nazi
Germany's intentions in the 1930s, America's assessments of the Soviet
Union's intentions during the Carter administration, and the Reagan
administration's assessments of Soviet intentions near the end of the
Cold War. She advances a new theoretical framework--called selective
attention--that emphasizes organizational dynamics, personal diplomatic
interactions, and cognitive and affective factors. Yarhi-Milo finds that
decision makers don't pay as much attention to those aspects of state
behavior that major theories of international politics claim they do.
Instead, they tend to determine the intentions of adversaries on the
basis of preexisting beliefs, theories, and personal impressions.
Yarhi-Milo also shows how intelligence organizations rely on very
different indicators than decision makers, focusing more on changes in
the military capabilities of adversaries.
Knowing the Adversary provides a clearer picture of the historical
validity of existing theories, and broadens our understanding of the
important role that diplomacy plays in international security.