Affirmative action in college admissions - considering whether an
applicant is part of an underrepresented group when making selection
decisions - has long been a topic of heated public debate. Some argue
that it undermines racial equity. Others advocate for its ability to
promote equal opportunity in a racially unequal society. Who is right?
Natasha Warikoo dives into the arguments for and against a policy that
has made it to the US Supreme Court many times. She digs into the
purposes of higher education and the selection process itself to argue
that it is a mistake to equate college admissions with personal merit
and reward. College admissions should be based on furthering the mission
of higher education: contributing to our shared democracy and to the
human condition. Ultimately, Warikoo concludes that a focus on
individual fairness conceals much more important questions about
justice. No matter what their perspective, readers will find themselves
thinking anew and asking the deeper questions that underlie this emotive
debate.