Kenneth Laing challenges the concept of Irenaeus as the primary witness
to the point at which the New Testament achieved scriptural status, and
calls into question some of the most basic conclusions and assumptions
of New Testament canon formation scholarship. Laing proposes a new
interpretation of Irenaeus' understanding of the nature and basis of
authority of the New Testament writings, based on his christocentric
theology of revelation.
By exploring the texts themselves, the concept of authority, scriptural
tradition and the question of inspiration, Laing argues that while the
writings possess authority equal to the Jewish scriptures, it is their
apostolic origin and the apostles' relationship to Christ - not
inspiration - which forms the basis of the unique revelatory authority
of the New Testament writings. Laing thus stresses that Irenaeus regards
the New Testament writings as a written record of the apostolic
tradition and the primary means of accessing its content, rather than as
a purely scriptural text.