This monograph provides a new account of justified inference as a
cognitive process. In contrast to the prevailing tradition in
epistemology, the focus is on low-level inferences, i.e., those
inferences that we are usually not consciously aware of and that we
share with the cat nearby which infers that the bird which she sees
picking grains from the dirt, is able to fly. Presumably, such
inferences are not generated by explicit logical reasoning, but logical
methods can be used to describe and analyze such inferences.
Part 1 gives a purely system-theoretic explication of belief and
inference. Part 2 adds a reliabilist theory of justification for
inference, with a qualitative notion of reliability being employed. Part
3 recalls and extends various systems of deductive and nonmonotonic
logic and thereby explains the semantics of absolute and high
reliability. In Part 4 it is proven that qualitative neural networks are
able to draw justified deductive and nonmonotonic inferences on the
basis of distributed representations. This is derived from a
soundness/completeness theorem with regard to cognitive semantics of
nonmonotonic reasoning. The appendix extends the theory both logically
and ontologically, and relates it to A. Goldman's reliability account of
justified belief.
This text will be of interest to epistemologists and logicians, to all
computer scientists who work on nonmonotonic reasoning and neural
networks, and to cognitive scientists.