My impulse when I decided to collect into a single volume the essays on
topics in logical theory and related subjects that I have written in the
last fifteen years was to borrow from the title of a work by Sextus
Empiricus, and call my collection "Against the Logicians." Although the
essays address a variety of problems that interest me, the thread that
runs through them is a scepticism about how logicians see things. So,
the title appealed to me. However, I had second thoughts and chose
instead a title of one of my own essays, "In Defense of Informal Logic",
which emphasizes my support for other approaches. Although my criticisms
of logical theory are designed to cut deeply, I do not want to be
unresponsive to the needs that it is supposed to satisfy. However, my
position that we have adequate resources for critically analyzing a
particular argument and 00 not need a theory of argumentation, will not
completely satisfy those who think that there is a need for it. So, I
want them to know that I am taking their concerns seriously.