This book studies how Hungarian verbs can occur with implicit subject
and direct object arguments in a complex approach. On the basis of the
critical evaluations of the previous literature on implicit arguments,
analyses of a wide spectrum of data from various direct sources, and
theoretical explanations, all of which were supported by systematic
metatheoretical considerations, it concludes that in Hungarian, verbs do
not vary as to whether they can be used with implicit arguments or not,
but they vary as to the manner in which they can occur with such
arguments. In other words, they vary in terms of the lexical and
grammatical constraints which are placed on them, and in what contexts
they can be used with lexically unrealised arguments. Although the
cognitive principle of relevance guides the licensing and interpretation
processes of implicit arguments, the variety of their occurrences does
not rest solely on the presumption of relevance but on the different
lexical, grammatical, and pragmatic properties of Hungarian and its use,
as well as on their various interactions. So, it is only by operating
together that a grammar and an adequate pragmatic theory can account for
the occurrences and identification mechanisms of implicit arguments.