Against the background of NATO's Istanbul conference of 1971 (Cronbach
and Drenth, 1972), the Kingston conference shows that great progress has
been made by the community of cross-cultural psychologists. The progress
is as much in the psychology of the investigators as in the
investigations being reported. In 1971 the investigators were mostly
strangers to each other. Behind their reports lay radically different
field experiences, disparate research traditions, and mutually
contradictory social ideals. Istanbul was not a Tower of Babel, but
participants did speak past each other. Now a community exists, thanks
to the meetings of NATO and the International Association for
Cross-Cultural Psychology, to flourishing journals, and the Triandis et
a1. (1980) Handbook. The members tend to know each other, can anticipate
how their formu- lations will fallon the ears of others, and accept
superficially divergent approaches as making up a collective enterprise.
Ten years ago there was open conflict between those who con- fronted
exotic peoples with traditional tests and applied tradi- tional
interpretations to the responses, and the relativists who insisted that
tasks, test taking, and interpretation cannot be "standardized" in the
ways that matter. Today's investigators are conscious of the need to
revalidate tasks carried into alien settings; they often prefer to
redesign the mode of presentation and to attune the subject to test
taking. They face the diffi- culties squarely and recognize that even
the best means of coping are only partially successful.