This book is about a new and different way of approaching and studying
the history of the built environment and the use of historical
precedents in design. However, although what I am proposing is new for
what is currently called architectural history, both my approach and
even my conclusions are not that new in other fields, as I discovered
when I attempted to find supporting evidence. * In fact, of all the
disciplines dealing with various aspects of the study of the past,
architectural history seems to have changed least in the ways I am
advocating. There is currently a revival of interest in the history of
architecture and urban form; a similar interest applies to theory,
vernacular design, and culture-environment relations. After years of
neglect, the study of history and the use of historical precedent are
again becoming important. However, that interest has not led to new
approaches to the subject, nor have its bases been examined. This I try
to do. In so doing, I discuss a more rigorous and, I would argue, a more
valid way of looking at historical data and hence of using such data in
a theory of the built environment and as precedent in environmental
design. Underlying this is my view of Environment-Behavior Studies CEBS)
as an emerging theory rather than as data to help design based on
current "theory. " Although this will be the subject of another book, a
summary statement of this position may be useful.