Having lost much of its political clout and theoretical power, communism
no longer represents an appealing alternative to capitalism. In its
original Marxist formulation, communism promised an ideal of
development, but only through a logic of war, and while a number of
reformist governments still promote this ideology, their legitimacy has
steadily declined since the fall of the Berlin wall.
Separating communism from its metaphysical foundations, which include an
abiding faith in the immutable laws of history and an almost holy
conception of the proletariat, Gianni Vattimo and Santiago Zabala recast
Marx's theories at a time when capitalism's metaphysical moorings--in
technology, empire, and industrialization--are buckling. While Michael
Hardt and Antonio Negri call for a return of the revolutionary left,
Vattimo and Zabala fear this would lead only to more violence and failed
political policy. Instead, they adopt an antifoundationalist stance
drawn from the hermeneutic thought of Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida,
and Richard Rorty.
Hermeneutic communism leaves aside the ideal of development and the
general call for revolution; it relies on interpretation rather than
truth and proves more flexible in different contexts. Hermeneutic
communism motivates a resistance to capitalism's inequalities yet
intervenes against violence and authoritarianism by emphasizing the
interpretative nature of truth. Paralleling Vattimo and Zabala's
well-known work on the weakening of religion, Hermeneutic Communism
realizes the fully transformational, politically effective potential of
Marxist thought.