Between 2013-2017, around 115 EU trademark applications were rejected on
morality and public order grounds. In the GCC (six Arab and Islamic
countries), anecdotal evidence suggests some refusals have bemused
foreign applicants and highlighted cultural blindspots. In this context,
this work examines how three Arab Gulf states that have Islamic law as
the main source of legislation and large expatriate communities, apply
moral bars to trademark registration. It draws comparison with Western
jurisdictions. Three main questions are explored: 1) To what extent do
immoral or borderline trademarks/goods proceed to registration in
conservative Islamic countries that apply trademark law in conformity
with Shari'a law? 2) What reasoning is guiding decisions? 3) Can a
concept of 'harm' improve our understanding of the power of trademarks
and thus the moral thresholds that countries set? The author is an
innovation and IP commercialisation professional. She acquired a passion
for trademark law while completing a Master of Laws in 'Intellectual
Property and Competition Law' in Munich, Germany. She is now pursuing a
career in trademark law in the UK.