The motivation underlying our development of a "handbook" of creativity
was different from what usually is described by editors of other such
volumes. Our sense that a handbook was needed sprang not from a deluge
of highly erudite studies calling out for organization, nor did it stem
from a belief that the field had become so fully articulated that such a
book was necessary to provide summation and reference. Instead, this
handbook was conceptualized as an attempt to provide structure and
organization for a field of study that, from our perspective, had come
to be a large-scale example of a "degenerating" research program (see
Brown, Chapter 1). The handbook grew out of a series of discussions that
spanned several years. At the heart of most of our interactions was a
profound unhappiness with the state of research on creativity. Our
consensus was that the number of "good" works published on creativity
each year was small and growing smaller. Further, we could not point to
a journal, text, or professional organization that was providing
leadership for the field in shaping a scientifically sound framework for
the development of research programs in creativity. At the same time, we
were casting about for a means of honoring a dear friend, E. Paul
Torrance. Our decision was that we might best be able to honor Paul and
influence research on creativity by developing a handbook designed to
challenge traditional perspectives while offering research agendas based
on contemporary psychological views.