De cibo quod superest nobis sufficit; oportet gratias agere. Some elders
have accepted this proposition, although seldom with enthu- siasm.
Gerontologists also have been burdened with the adage: "Leftovers are
good enough for us, and we should be grateful for them." I remember how
a clerk tried to palm off astale and cheap cigar to her octogenarian
customer. He knew better and carne away with a far superior smoke. The
clerk fumed, "What does he need a good cigar for? Who is he to be
particular!" In this and in many other ways, elders often have labored
under the sociocultural expectation that they should be well content
with whatever scraps and shmattes happen to come their way.
Gerontologists can identify with this situation. The systematic study of
aging and the aged was a new enterprise at the midpoint of this century,
but the concepts and methods were pretty much limited to those already
on hand. What biological and sociobehavioral scientists had been doing
for years was simply extended to the newly annexed territory. This as
not only a convenient but also a cost-effective strategy. Data
accumulated more rapidly by remaining within familiar frarnes of
reference and relying on farniliar designs and mea- sures. The new
gerontologists soon harvested a promising crop of descriptive findings.
Within a decade after the establishment of the Gerontological Society of
America (1947), it was possible to discern the outlines of a valuable
new field of knowledge.