\The contrast between individual Psychology and Social or Group
Psychology, which at a first glance may seem to be full of significance,
loses a great deal of its sharpness when it is examined more closely. It
is true that individual Psychology is concerned with the individual man
and explores the paths by which he seeks to find satisfaction for his
instincts; but only rarely and under certain exceptional conditions is
individual Psychology in a position to disregard the relations of this
individual to others. In the individual\s mental life someone else is
invariably involved, as a model, as an object, as a helper, as an
opponent, and so from the very first individual Psychology is at the
same time Social Psychology as well - in this extended but entirely
justifiable sense of the words. Thc relations of an individual to his
parents and to his brothers and sisters, to the object of his love, and
to his physician - in fact all the relations which have hitherto been
the chief subject of psychoanalytic research - may claim to be
considered as social phenomena; and in this respect they may be
contrasted with certain other processes, describcd by us as
\narcissistic\, in which the satisfaction of the instincts is
partially or totally withdrawn from the influence of other people. The
contrast between social and narcissistic-Bleuler would perhaps call them
\autistic\-mental acts therefore falls wholly within the domain of
Individual Psychology, and is not well calculated to diffcrentiate it
from a Social or Group Psychology.\ [...] This fantastic book of Dr.
Sigmund Freud is a reprint of the original published work in 1922.
