Current theories on the nature and history of the Chadic verbal system
claim that Proto-Chadic had (aa fundamental binary distinction of
aspect, in which (b) the Perfective was the unmarked category, and that
(c) a characteristically marked Imperfective verb stem can be
reconstructed for the proto- languageThis paper presents comparative
evidence from 10 languages of the Biu- Mandara branch of Chadic, on the
basis of which all three claims are rejectedThe existence of dichotomous
aspect systems in some modern Chadic languages is explained by and
related to essentially three simplification and / (or) elaboration
processes which are attributed to the linguistic history of the in
dividual branches of the family: (1) loss of stem- final marking de
vices with compensatory shift to preverbal marking (2) redesignation of
the proto-verbal noun, and (3) redesignation of verbal plurals.