Of the most common approaches to apologetics, which is most
effective?
The goal of apologetics is to persuasively defend Christianity against
charges of falsehood, inconsistency, or credulity. It's an intellectual
discipline that serves to bolster the faith of Christian believers and
to aid the task of evangelism, but are some methods more effective than
others?
Five Views on Apologetics examines the "how-to" of apologetics,
putting five prominent techniques under the microscope:
- Classical - represented by William Lane Craig
- Evidential - represented by Gary Habermas
- Cumulative Case - represented by Paul D. Feinberg
- Presuppositional - represented by John M. Frame
- Reformed Epistemology - represented by Kelly James Clark
Offering a forum for presentation, critique, and defense, this book
allows the contributors for the different viewpoints to respond to the
others. Your own informed conclusions can then guide you as you meet the
questions of a needy world with the claims of the gospel.
The Counterpoints series presents a comparison and critique of
scholarly views on topics important to Christians that are both
fair-minded and respectful of the biblical text. Each volume is a
one-stop reference that allows readers to evaluate the different
positions on a specific issue and form their own, educated opinion.