The growing interest in research on temperament during the last decade
has been re- corded by several authors (e. g., R. Plomin; J. E. Bates)
from such sources of informa- tion as the Social Sciences Citation Index
or Psychological Abstracts. The editors' inquiry shows that the number
of cases in which the term temperament was used in the title of a paper
or in the paper's abstract published in Psychological Abstracts reveals
an essential increase in research on temperament. During the years 1975
to 1979, the term temperament was used in the title and/or summary of
173 abstracts (i. e., 34. 6 publications per year); during the next five
years (1980-1984), it was used in 367 abstracts (73. 4 publications per
year), whereas in the last five years (1985 to 1989), the term has
appeared in 463 abstracts, that is, in 92. 6 publications per year. Even
if the review of temperament literature is restricted to those
abstracts, it can easily be concluded that temperament is used in
different contexts and with different meanings, hardly allowing any
comparisons or general statements. One of the consequences of this state
of affairs is that our knowledge on temperament does not cumulate
despite the increasing research activity in this field. This situation
in temperament research motivated the editors to organize a one- week
workshop on The Diagnosis of Temperament (Bielefeld, Federal Republic of
Germany, September 1987).