In the aftermath of the Asian/global financial crises of 1997-98, how
should emerging markets now structure their exchange rate systemsto
prevent new crises from occurring? This study challengescurrent
orthodoxy by advocating the revival of intermediate exchangerate
regimes. In so doing, Williamson presents a reasoned challenge tothe new
prevailing attitude that claims that all countries involved in the
international capital markets need to polarize to one of the extreme
regimes (to a fixed rate with either a currency board or dollarization,
or to a lightly-managed float). He concludes that although there is some
truth in the allegation that intermediate regimes are vulnerable to
speculative crises, they still offer offsetting advantages. He also
contends that it would be possible to redesign them to be more flexible
so as to reduce their vulnerability to crises.