An international team of authorities in the field of standard setting
discuss what standard setting is and should be. Their accounts of a
representative selection of jurisdictions (Chile, England, France,
Georgia, Ireland, Queensland, South Africa, Sweden, and the United
States) are accompanied by lively critical commentaries from other
experts in this domain. Together, the editors challenge the notion that
there is a single superior way of thinking about national examinations,
and instead encourage educators and policymakers to engage with the
multiple perspectives offered here, and to consider carefully the
complex issues raised.