We know that we are fallible creatures, liable to cognitive bias. But we
also have a strong and stubborn tendency to overestimate our reasoning
capacities. This presents a problem for any attempt to help us reason in
more accurate ways: While we might see the point of others heeding
intellectual advice and relying on reasoning aids, each and every one of
us will tend not to see the point of doing so ourselves. The present
book argues that the solution to this problem lies in accepting a form
of epistemic paternalism. Accepting such paternalism is to accept that
we are sometimes justified in interfering with the inquiry of another
without her consent but for her own epistemic good. Because when it
comes to our freedom to conduct inquiry in whatever way we see fit, more
is not always better. In fact, less is often more.